I had a 2014 eco and 2016 eco. Drove both to 100,000 miles. Never knew they had the CP4 until I got my 2020 3500. Never put any additives in, either. Just drove them and never worried about a thing.Curious about the ECO Diesels. Haven't they had a similar CP4 problem but to a lesser extent?
My 16 eco cp4 exploded at about 25k miles or so, have a friend still driving a 15 eco with over 100k on it i think and no issues from the cp4 yet. So the problem does exist, some just get lucky.I had a 2014 eco and 2016 eco. Drove both to 100,000 miles. Never knew they had the CP4 until I got my 2020 3500. Never put any additives in, either. Just drove them and never worried about a thing.
Does he regret selling it now? LolI have conducted my own investigation. The result is a removal of the CP4.2 by way of GIVEMETHEVIN.com
Paid $60,600 Sept. 2020. Sold for $62,000. CP4 conversion offer I couldn't refuse. Stellantis conversion failed.
My first dive into something modern other than GM over the past decades. Was really impressed with the RAM interior, the exterior paint quality, and overall build. Very unimpressed with FCA/Stellantis transparency. NHTSA manufacture communications on my model came to a halt around May . If you see what other MFGs provide it's staggering in comparison. The CP4.2 debacle has lost a customer. Sure, I'll get the Hellzsniper laugh react, the off-topic brow beating for this post from Brutal....etc....but it really is too bad. I'm the one they come after in all the commercials and marketing. I buy new vehicles far too regularly and convince many others in person and through web content (how bout that Messages/Reaction Score eh? lol) and am fiercely brand loyal.
Here's hoping your CP4.2 issues get resolved. Y'all really do deserve some closure after how much you've spent on these rigs.
Cheers.
Maybe not good news for all. Just checked my engine number (March 2020 3500 build) and I don't think mine is on the list but I've got the older gen CP4.2. Below posted on another forum.
Y87 Advanced Communication.pdf
drive.google.comAnd my HO is P53041230BA. Doesn't seem to make the cut.....Y87 Advanced Communication.pdf
drive.google.com
Why would they pour extra $$$ to engineering another solution when there's already one that they are using on the 21+ truck?I won’t be 100% relieved till there’s verification it’s not just another revision of the cp4. With my luck we’ll be on to the cp4.3 or something.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why would they pour extra $$$ to engineering another solution when there's already one that they are using on the 21+ truck?
Remember, they had to work with the NHTSA on this, so there was a parent at the table approving these choices. This wasn't Ram just making a call, the federal gov got involved here so it's not going to be like that.I won’t be 100% relieved till there’s verification it’s not just another revision of the cp4. With my luck we’ll be on to the cp4.3 or something.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Remember, they had to work with the NHTSA on this, so there was a parent at the table approving these choices. This wasn't Ram just making a call, the federal gov got involved here so it's not going to be like that.
Should come to the North but will be 6 to 8 months late like all recalls. Safety ones included.I keep seeing FCA US i hope us Canadians dont get left out….
I mean I also see your point over there since those new 21+ pump is not a direct bolt-on to 19-20 truck. I just think that re-engineering an adapter simply a cheaper solution.I don’t disagree with your logic. But it’s 2021, no one does anything that makes any sense.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good point lolShould come to the North but will be 6 to 8 months late like all recalls. Safety ones included.