Ram Heavy Duty Forum
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
LETS SEE THOSE 35'S ON STOCK WHEELS
- Thread starter 22RAMAlazan
- Start date
LegendaryLawman
Legendary Pessimist
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2022
- Messages
- 358
- Reaction score
- 195
What kind of MPG drop are you guys seeing with the 285 Falkin at3? I personally wouldn’t go with the 12.5 wide tires prefer slightly larger than stock 285/65 would be a nice happy medium imo
35 12.50 17 on stock power wagon....the Nitto grapplers very slight rub due to the side profile...
swapped to toyo at in the same size and no rub.
now back in a diesel Rebel....dont care for the 20's but gonna run them for now
swapped to toyo at in the same size and no rub.
now back in a diesel Rebel....dont care for the 20's but gonna run them for now
I really want to do the same. Reverse level. My 5er would look better in tow as well.
Sent from me
unclelala
Well-Known Member
Can it be done without changing the payload ?
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2021
- Messages
- 3,250
- Reaction score
- 3,042
Payload is a number that can’t be changed, up or down, by mods. It can legally be changed under federal law, but that’s a different story.
With the proper reverse level there will be no negative side effects to load handling, especially if airbags are included in the reverse level.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2021
- Messages
- 3,250
- Reaction score
- 3,042
Depends on how low you want to go. Shorter shocks, a different trac-bar, and anti-swaybar links could all be needed if you go low enough.
I'm going with this- 2-.2.5". Have to measure again soon.
This is just what I want for my ‘24 3500 Longhorn. Just gotta decide on rims. 18” or 20”. This is the look I want.