Lots of banks haters on these boards...you've already heard inadvertent confirmation of gales testing that the MH cover reduces efficiency....the sight glass for filling is super nice as is the drain plug....you're gonna hear people talking about how they like to inspect at every oil change but if there isn't a bunch of stuff on your magnetic plug there isn't a reason to pull the cover....it's a well built cover and it does what they say ....I carry a thermal temp gun in my truck and always check the diff and trailer hubs when stopping....plus the fact that if you ever get one of the scoops ripped off they'll replace the cover free....I emailed them and asked if they actually do this and they said yes and they've already replaced some....whats the word on the diff cover ? my 2020 6.7 4x4 could use a cool new cover but does it really work ? who has this on their vehicle ? my next tow will be checking diff oil temp
Lots of banks haters on these boards...you've already heard inadvertent confirmation of gales testing that the MH cover reduces efficiency....
Of course you have the data to back that non sense!?!If you are talking my comment, the banks will be worse about efficiency…
If not, nevermind.
IME, banks supporters are generally folks duped by creative marketing looking to back their expensive decision. Not always, but generally.
Told ya....no they don't test anything....or for that matter even have the product....just yammering their unfounded opinions.....wow 4 posts and 3 haters, does any of these comments come from actual testing ? i do have a thermal gun being an hvac company owner and do plan to check my next tow. i like the look of that Ram-Cover and looking into the engineering and design it seems to offer better lubrication and cooling (what its supposed to do)
Of course you have the data to back that non sense!?!
Told ya....no they don't test anything....or for that matter even have the product....just yammering their unfounded opinions.....
Spin the too cold theory some more....doesn't work with the TBV and doesn't work here....nice try tho....Banks even claims better cooling, so yes. Too cool of fluid is the reason for the decrease in fuel efficiency I mentioned.
So extremely uneducated.Spin the too cold theory some more....doesn't work with the TBV and doesn't work here....nice try tho....
Glad you finally admitted you don't know what you're talking about...would you do us all a favor and post up your diff cover and transmission building certifications? Since you think you know everything....also you should go find the stay stock threads....if you put a product on your truck it's an ok piece....if somebody puts something different on theirs you slam it....one might think you're more of a nut swinger! Any way you look at it the OP asked about the Banks cover....you rambled about mag hytec and stock...great contribution to the Banks cover thread yet again....we get you don't like banks...you're dismissed....So extremely uneducated.
If you think gear lube at ambient temp isn’t thicker, and thus requires more energy to go down the road, than warmed up gear lube then I’ve got a bridge for ya.
You are a marketing teams dream… just keep throwing your money at them, they love it.
wow 4 posts and 3 haters, does any of these comments come from actual testing ? i do have a thermal gun being an hvac company owner and do plan to check my next tow. i like the look of that Ram-Cover and looking into the engineering and design it seems to offer better lubrication and cooling (what its supposed to do)
i dont believe the gear lube temp is going to affect MPG thats absurd ! your saying the friction is so much greater at ambient than at working temp is BS. if it did affect mpg the loss would so minimal it wouldnt register