It has been almost 3 months since I received notification that my truck had been built and has presumably been sitting waiting for transportation (KZ) ever since. Of course, this blog has had quite a few posts about the hailstorm, but no feedback from Ram on anything related to the truck. Several calls to the dealership yields the same, "it just takes a long time" song. So, last Thursday I decided I needed to talk to Ram's "customer care" about getting status on the truck. I called their 800 number and spoke to a very pleasant lady who told me that she couldn't help me, but after making it clear that I wasn't going away until I received and acceptable answer, she handed me off to another Stellantis unit who informed me that they didn't know why I was referred to them, but connected me to yet another call center that started down the same path. Again, I insisted on speaking with someone who could get me an answer which resulted (after about 20 minutes) in her telling me that a "ticket had been opened" to get the status of the truck and "someone will get back to you within two business days." That was Thursday and since I hadn't heard from anyone (why am I not surprised?) I called again this morning to check on the status. And, the status is . . . no status. Apparently the "ticket" that had been opened last week was in the wrong queue and had been placed on hold (probably indefinite, just like my truck). So today, yet another ticket has been opened - this time in supposedly the correct department - and I was assured that it has priority and someone will be in touch with me by tomorrow. As I see the seeming randomness of shipping that is apparent from the spreadsheet, and the fact that there has been absolutely no follow up with me from either Stellantis or the dealership I'm convinced that Stellantis really doesn't care (actually this borders on being contemptuous) about its customers. I'll post again when I hear something. I'll refrain from adding another rant to this posting as I'm preaching to the choir with this group. More to follow . . .