joshuaeb09
Well-Known Member
I read an article somewhere on the internet (so it has to be true) the main reason for the litigation against Cummins was the tune allowed the truck to pass smog inspection at idle or at any continuous rpm up to redline. The NOX emissions (heat related) would increase under normal driving. So they encouraged Cummins to lower the NOX by increasing the fuel and increasing the soot since it has a filter to capture that. Even though it has the SCR to lower the NOX emissions with help from the DEF.
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if that is indeed the case. My truck, when it misbehaved the most, REALLY tried hard to get pre SCR NOX squashed with tons of EGR and what felt/looked like running rich. I'd honestly just rather spray more DEF than let the truck eat its own filth and put even more load on the DOC/DPF... Just seems stupid if you ask me and makes sense hearing about failure modes with face plugging, etc, on some higher mileage 4.32487298356829365389256 gens locally. Doesn't really seem to matter if its a farm truck, pavement princess, or hotshot - Some of them just fail with faceplugging, excessive regens, etc while others keep on trucking just fine. It seems like the factory calibrations and the margins within the calibrations are just "off" or the calibrations don't have enough correction factor capacitiy along with margin of error in the MAF, MAP, IAT, etc sensors throwing it into a "bad state".
Doing some more additive testing with our small fleet of two '22s (plus friends/extended family) the Archoil at the Perf dose seems to make the most difference with our local fuel blends/quality/charatecteristics with keeping the EGR from being "greedy" and keeping the DPF cleaned passively. Seems like HSS wasn't really doing much for us when we were using it unless I blended it at like 4-5x the perf dose in our local fuel. Primrose 5007 also seems to do a good job, but we've been reserving that for the tractor and other off road equipment that has its fuel stored for longer durations (the 5007 seems to do really good job for fuel storage based on fleet/ag customer feedback when I was selling the stuff). If I had the banks guages with the datalogging functionality rather than just the displays I'd do some longer term datalogging with different fuel/additives, but just tracking how the DPF and EGR is behaving is enough for me at this point to know what works and what doesn't on the trucks.
Also having put on my engineer hat, there are tons of research articles/papers/studies going back to the start of emissions crap that show certain additives can indeed help reduce NOX. Part of me speculates that the impact of the Archoil is actually the reduction of NOX along with cleaning ability making it ideal for us dealing with these newer trucks and how they're tuned these days. If you can drop the pre-SCR NOX via fuel/additives then it would make sense that it wouldn't richen up or eat more EGR to knock down the NOX.



