<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="member: 8393" data-quote="GeneralClortho" data-source="post: 77929"
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
<a href="/forum/goto/post?id=77929"
class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
rel="nofollow"
data-xf-click="attribution"
data-content-selector="#post-77929">GeneralClortho said:</a>
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
I had a '13 1500 and it was plenty of truck for my needs, but the 5.5' bed was annoyingly small. Also, the 5.7L tends to blow up, and I want to keep the truck for 250k miles if I can. I know three folks that spent $8k replacing the 5.7L at 101k to 140k miles, so the 1500 was off the table for me. After researching the 6.4L, it became clear that the engineers built into that engine preventive measures that are week points on the 5.7L (head cooling, sodium filled valves, etc...).<br />
<br />
Reason 2: Power Wagon...nuff said.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote><br />
I believe you're wrong WRT the 5.7 and 6.4. The 6.4 is a heavy duty engine, but it still has the same lifter failures that the 5.7 has (which is the only real issue with the 5.7). In fact, one former chrysler tech of 20+ years claims that he personally saw more 6.4 lifter failures than 5.7, which is shocking considering the sell rate of both engines (5.7 is sold in far higher numbers). Think his youtube channel is "reignited" or something like that.<br />
<br />
If you're paranoid about the hemi tick/lifter issue, like I am, then you may want to consider doing Blackstone used oil analysis. Apparently sometimes high wear levels show up in the reports 2 or 3 oil changes before the actual failure.</div>