<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="member: 2087" data-quote="John Jensen" data-source="post: 281779"
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
<a href="/forum/goto/post?id=281779"
class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
rel="nofollow"
data-xf-click="attribution"
data-content-selector="#post-281779">John Jensen said:</a>
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
Yes, the Y43 recall. You are correct, the recall makes it sound like a DPF sensor. The truck is shipped without the sensor in the SCR. It has a sensor in the DPF. The recall installs the SCR sensor, referred to as a Particulate Matter Sensor
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>The sensor is installed at the outlet of the SCR chamber, but does not measure NOx or have anything to do with DEF dosing or consumption. It’s there to count “particulate matter” which is soot. The only reason Ram was successful in getting CARB to sign the MOU and allow them to sell the trucks without the sensor in place was because the PM sensor had no direct influence on how the entire emissions system meets targeted PM and NOx standards. The system functions exactly as all other model year trucks do, with the exception that it doesn’t have the ability to check the emissions for excessive soot exiting. They were hedging their bets that the systems would function well enough for long enough that ram could obtain the sensors within the year or so and have them installed before any of the DPF’s started failing. That’s why when the sensors first became available again, they issued the Y43 recall to cab & chassis trucks first, knowing full well the commercial trucks would rack up mileage faster than the pickups.</div>