Strange move to exclude the new Cummins with 1000 lb/ft for all but the 3500. Reason?
Are they trying to make the 2500 buyers to move to 3500?
What is the CP4 Issue?I am pretty happy with the power and torque numbers, but I am very disappointed they went from the reliable CP3 injector pump to the infamous CP4.
Just google CP4 failure and you can read for days. So, the CP3 that Cummins has run since common rail came out in '03 is very reliable, and if it does fail it just quits and you change it out. Ford and GM have been running the CP4, and it does not do well with the ULSD fuel in the US, it is much, much, much more sensitive to fuel quality issues, and due to the basic design, when a CP4 fails it makes shrapnel that ruins the lines, the rails, the injectors, the relief valves, the rail pressure sensors, etc. So basically it ruins the entire fuel system. GM finally got away from it and went to a Denso system. Ford offers a kit to convert to a CP3. What does that tell you??? Now there are rumors of Ford getting away from the CP4, too.What is the CP4 Issue?
Forgive me, but the information put forth stated CP4.2, and that is not speculation. Here is the lead engineer at Cummins clearly stating it in this video:
I believe so. I was told the CP4 costs substantially less than the CP3, so...So the CP4.2 is used in the HO engine, but is it used in the non HO Cummins engine?
This threads a bit old, but had some pretty good predictions.Interesting, as the 2500 has over 130 days' supply, and most heavy duties are not far behind. Used prices are falling as new prices have to fall. Stellantis has been the worst price hog in the last couple of years. For grins I tried building a '24 3500 similar to my '21 Laramie, and now I have to order the HO if I want anything other than a black interior. Also noticed the retractable running boards are now gone as well.