I could drive any pickup I wanted; the main reasons I chose the Ram 2500 are the Cummins straight six, the rear suspension, and the interior. Notice I said 2500 and rear suspension. Yes, I know the limitations of the design, however, it performs very well for what I tow (which I don't do too often). I have a 32' gooseneck trailer with air ride and hydraulic disc brakes, I have had some extreme loads on it with no performance issues. Also, I tow several different bumper-pull trailers, no issues there either. However, with tall loads and a solid fifth wheel, the rear setup on the 2500 Ram is not ideal; the problem is not the spring rate, but the inboard placement of the coils. Adding a sway bar to the rear is not as good as moving the springs further outboard. The sway bar in the rear makes the load behave like an upside down pendulum. With leaf springs in the rear, the springs are further outboard AND leaf springs have internal friction that helps to resist the 'pendulum effect'. For gooseneck and bumper pull trailers, the five-link with coils performs at least as good as the leaf sprung setups. Empty, the five-link with coils rides better than leafs. But with tall high center of gravity fifth-wheel trailers, the five-link is far from ideal...
Also, the Ram 2500 is 10,000 lbs GVWR while the GM/Chev 2500 is 11,350 lbs with the Duramax. So that 'rating' handicaps the Ram 2500. Although I would have no problem loading up the rear axle to its full rating of 6,040 lbs, which allows about 3,000 lbs on the ball. Of course that puts it about 1,500 lbs over GVWR since the payload on my door says 2,030 lbs and we still need a driver, et cetera...