ramblinChet
Drinks Alone
- Messages
- 641
- Reaction score
- 3,051
- Points
- 93
delete
Last edited:
According to jeep all you have to do is have a hitch receiver installed that was their fix for the jeep grand Cherokees who had the tank behind the rear axle! Lol this is the perfect representation why this is a bad idea!
Just because you can do a thing, doesn't mean you should do a thing.And per Titan instructions they require a Class V hitch to be installed. It makes sense for protective purposes and up until a few decades ago tens-of-millions of vehicles have been driving around safely with gas tanks between the bumper and rear axle. It is simple to protect that area and I am confident the RAM provides that in spades.
Interesting, Side note i knew the ZJ had the fuel tank issue never knew the liberty was part of that, good to know, i have no clue how the CJ5 , CJ7 ,YJ, LJand tj were not part of that as the fuel tank is right at the rear aswell they had a little thin fuel skid perhaps thats why![]()
Chrysler and the Defective Design of Jeeps with Unsafe Fuel Tanks
Many of us will remember the notorious Ford Pinto, which made headlines in the 1970’s and 1980’s with revelations about its terribly vulnerable fuel tankwww.expertinstitute.com
Honestly i would build a skid plate that protects the bottom of the tank then i know it would be safe to runAnd per Titan instructions they require a Class V hitch to be installed. It makes sense for protective purposes and up until a few decades ago tens-of-millions of vehicles have been driving around safely with gas tanks between the bumper and rear axle. It is simple to protect that area and I am confident the RAM provides that in spades.
Correction... you would 'guess' it would be safe to run.Honestly i would build a skid plate that protects the bottom of the tank then i know it would be safe to run
Well your right it would be an educated guess though.... the gaurd would be thickest metal on the truck too at 5/16 thickCorrection... you would 'guess' it would be safe to run.
It is not certified for gasoline so you cannot 'know' it would be safe.
That would be a hefty slab of metal...Well your right it would be an educated guess though.... the gaurd would be thickest metal on the truck too at 5/16 thick
I dont see why it would as the top would be open to the air like normalThat would be a hefty slab of metal...
My only other thoughts would be venting and if it would set off any warning lights.
Just t in to a vent line from the existing tank vent lines you can buy the stuff to fix vent lines on amazon and just use them to add the lineFrom what I can gather so far the only real challenge with the installation would involve connecting the new tank into the existing EVAP system. The tank materials and hoses are of acceptable material and construction - I am not 100% sure regarding the electric pump being used but sourcing a gasoline specific pump with the same flow rate would not be an issue.
Has anyone else spliced an auxiliary tank into the existing EVAP system that has relevant information to share?
Here is a tank manufactured by Brown Davis.
View attachment 16601
@Oilbrnr pointed out that in this video below around 12:00 he shows this same tank in a 2018 AEV Prospector which has the 6.7L Cummins.
For an update, I recently communicated with them on the possibility to custom make a larger gas tank for the PW, but they regretted advising that they only make the larger tanks for Diesel, hence no further hope, for now at least!IF I could get the Brown Davis tank in the US I would try it.
For an update, I recently communicated with them on the possibility to custom make a larger gas tank for the PW, but they regretted advising that they only make the larger tanks for Diesel, hence no further hope, for now at least!
Honestly i would build a skid plate that protects the bottom of the tank then i know it would be safe to run