So this reprogramming is only for model years prior to 2025?Unless someone has cracked the security on 25MY+ (haven't seen that confirmed) the tools and dealers can only select PSIs that were pre programmed matching tire options that came stock. if your tires are outside that your stuck till that happens.
Ram won’t be sued for that (or if they were the case would be quickly dismissed) since they and every other manufacturer say to only replace tires with the same ones that came on the vehicle from the factory.So this reprogramming is only for model years prior to 2025?
I’m just waiting for RAM to be sued because someone chose to install aftermarket tires that don’t meet the requirements of the programmed TPMS and they over inflate to 65psi and have a blowout that causes an accident where someone gets injured. I’ve had work mates that have died from massive head injury due to over inflating tires.
yes, pre 2025 are able to be changed by tools like J-Scan or alphaOBD. Someone will figure out the security on the new canbus eventually just hasn't happened yet that I've seen. There are threads on it with more detailed info.So this reprogramming is only for model years prior to 2025?
Someone who understands my logic! Well stated Crusty! The reasoning behind the law suits and the TPMS doesn’t make sense. If the manufacturers were worried about getting sued why do they install engines and speedometers that exceed the mandated speed limit laws? This tells me if I have an accident doing 100 mph I have the right to sue the manufacturer because their product allowed me to exceed these legal limits…All I can say is blame the lawyers. They've sued the companies so much for BS that the companies are scared and covering their ass.
That's one of the reasons the tire pressure on the door is a joke. The recommended pressure on there is for a maxed out loaded truck. Who drives around with their load maxed out all the time?
Greedy Attorneys! I’ll leave it at that lest Brutal-HD comes along and reprimands us for getting off subject….It's probably been done already.
It's like the lady that spilled her HOT coffee in her lap and sued McD for a million and won.
Why are we rewarding stupid people?
Way off topic here: There’s definitely too much frivolous litigation, but the McDonalds coffee thing was legit. It was a 79 year old woman and they handed her a cup of coffee at 190°, 50-60° above what’s standard for serving coffee. She asked them only to cover her medical expenses but they completely ignored her so that’s when she brought the lawsuit.It's probably been done already.
It's like the lady that spilled her HOT coffee in her lap and sued McD for a million and won.
Why are we rewarding stupid people?
The lawsuit didn’t have anything to do with warning labels. That’s a myth that came up later.But why would you put a cup of hot coffee in your lap?
Now we have warning signs on everything. Don't drink gasoline as you might die.